
Key Takeaways
Will two years of regulatory delays finally end Evolution’s proposed acquisition of Galaxy Gaming? The supplier’s CEO Martin Carlesund signaled exactly that possibility on the agreement’s outside date, even as the company reported second-quarter net revenue of €517.8m.
The comments, first detailed by G3 Newswire, arrive alongside a modest year-on-year revenue decline of 1.2 per cent and an EBITDA margin that remained robust at 65.9 per cent. They mark a clear shift in tone from the commitment both parties expressed when extending the merger deadline in November 2025.
Evolution’s Q2 net revenue fell to €517.8m from €524.3m the prior year, while EBITDA eased to €341.0m from €345.3m. Profit for the quarter rose slightly to €251.4m and earnings per share reached €1.27. For the first six months of 2026, net revenue declined 1.4 per cent to €1.03bn with EBITDA at €676.3m and a 65.6 per cent margin.
Carlesund highlighted sequential progress. “Revenue and margin are moving in the right direction compared to the first quarter, cost control remains strong, cash flow is improving, and we continue to expand in key markets while executing on our product roadmap.” The supplier maintained disciplined cost management even as top-line pressure appeared.
Europe returned to quarter-on-quarter growth after several softer periods. Latin America outperformed with revenue growth of 26.3 per cent, driven by the reopening of Evolution’s Argentine studio and the launch of a localized Ice Fishing title in Brazil. North America advanced 9.5 per cent following the rollout of Monopoly Live across four US states and the opening of a second Michigan studio.
Asia remained the outlier, with revenue declining 3.7 per cent quarter-on-quarter amid heightened cybercrime activity. New releases including Hasbro-branded Monopoly Roulette and Monopoly Roll’em delivered encouraging early traction, alongside Ice Fishing’s emergence as a strong performer.
Carlesund stated: “Today, the currently agreed closing period under our agreement to acquire Galaxy Gaming expires. After today, either party may choose to terminate the agreement.” He added: “Two years have passed, and Evolution has spent significant time, effort and resources handling the rather large amount of administration required to close this acquisition.”
“Galaxy is a great company; however, due to its size, the transaction is not significant for Evolution. The outcome has no material impact on our existing business, our US operations, or our long-term ambitions.” The remarks represent a material change from the public reaffirmation of intent issued when the deadline was extended last November.
The two-year regulatory delay surrounding the Galaxy Gaming deal illustrates the structural friction now common in supplier consolidation. What began as a relatively small $85m transaction became mired in administration that ultimately outweighed its strategic weight for a company of Evolution’s scale. This reality carries particular weight in US states and LATAM markets where Evolution has otherwise posted growth.
A separate development this week added to the compliance ledger: Evolution reached a £4.75m settlement with the UK Gambling Commission following a licence review tied to content availability on six unlicensed websites. Carlesund said the matter had been resolved with no broader pattern of unlicensed access identified in the UK.
Coverage of the results understandably focuses on the financial numbers and the deal commentary. What remains underemphasized is how these prolonged approvals can quietly erode even modest M&A value for suppliers navigating layered US state and LATAM licensing regimes. The opportunity cost of two years’ regulatory focus is real, even when the deal itself is not material.
This episode signals an inflection point for supplier M&A. When regulatory timelines stretch far beyond initial expectations, even attractive targets can lose momentum. Evolution now appears positioned to emphasize organic growth, product innovation, and regional execution over protracted transactions.
For operators and investors, the lesson is clear: smaller supplier deals face elevated friction in today’s fragmented regulatory environment. Success increasingly hinges on internal momentum and disciplined cost control rather than betting on timely approvals. The coming quarters will show whether this pivot accelerates Evolution’s roadmap execution or whether other consolidation opportunities emerge on more achievable timelines.
We've watched this deal stall since day one. Evolution's growth engine is firing in LatAm and North America, but regulatory friction can strand even the smartest M&A. For operators and suppliers eyeing consolidation, this is the cost of underestimating compliance timelines and jurisdictional complexity across every regulated market.
SCCG angle: SCCG has guided 545 partners through regulatory mazes in every regulated market. When M&A timelines stretch or approvals stall, we activate the right legal, compliance, and government relations contacts to unstick deals or help clients pivot fast — before outside dates become exit ramps.
Gaming, betting and prediction markets — the desk’s read, every weekday.
Subscribe →