Aleksandar Popov Warns Bulgaria Against Replacing Gambling Regulatory Gaps With Excessive Rules
Aleksandar Popov states Bulgaria’s reforms target revenue alongside consumer protection but were adopted without enough analysis. Advertising rules shifted budgets to global platforms; venue closures may hit two-thirds of halls. He urges updated tech and payments rules plus regional cooperation to avoid strengthening unlicensed operators.
SCCG Take — Larger operators stand to gain from concentration while smaller venues face exit pressure. Regulators must prioritize enforceable standards that preserve licensed competitiveness over purely fiscal gains.
Bulgaria’s gambling reforms have introduced tighter advertising limits and land-based venue restrictions while pursuing added revenue. In an exclusive interview with Focus Gaming News, Aleksandar Popov, independent consultant and former director of the Directorate “Supervision of Gambling and Gambling Activities” at Bulgaria’s National Revenue Agency, examined the drivers and effects of these changes. Popov identified revenue collection as a central factor in a difficult fiscal environment, where the sector’s profitability and social perception make it a ready target for higher taxation or stricter oversight.
The advertising amendments, adopted too quickly and without sufficient legal and economic analysis, triggered a redistribution of marketing budgets. Operators shifted spending toward digital customer acquisition, affiliate structures, and remaining legal outdoor formats. A larger share of those budgets now flows to global platforms such as Google and Meta, reducing revenue for Bulgarian media while failing to eliminate consumer exposure to gambling messages.
Venue Limits and Structural Market Effects
Restrictions requiring closure of land-based gambling venues in towns with fewer than 10,000 inhabitants may affect roughly two-thirds of existing gaming halls. The Gambling Act provides a three-year transition, yet the regime leaves open questions likely to produce litigation, including the treatment of licence maintenance fees paid in advance. Popov noted a regulatory asymmetry: the population threshold applies to gaming halls and casinos but not in the same way to land-based sports betting outlets. Sustained local demand will likely drive consumers to larger towns, online platforms, or unlicensed options, producing greater concentration among bigger operators.
Risks of Over-Restriction and Paths Forward
Popov called for direct connection of land-based gaming machines to the National Revenue Agency, revised rules on responsible-gambling contribution spending, updated frameworks for applications and VLT terminals, and clearer standards for technology as both business tool and regulatory asset. He stressed that no national regulator can address illegal gambling, money laundering, cross-border payments, or global-platform advertising in isolation, urging stronger regional cooperation across Central and Eastern Europe without harmonizing taxation or product availability. Bulgaria maintains a relatively liberal and competitive framework that supports its full industry value chain, yet hurried changes risk reducing licensed operators’ visibility without curbing demand. The outcome hinges on whether rules remain coherent, enforceable, and paired with effective action against illegal supply.
Reporting: Focus Gaming News
Generated by SCCG’s automated editorial system from published source reporting. SCCG Management holds editorial responsibility.
Gaming, betting and prediction markets — the desk’s read, every weekday.
Subscribe →