SCCG · Payments

Finanstilsynet Orders Inpay A/S to Stop New Gambling Client Relationships After AML Breaches

growfresheurope
Finanstilsynet Orders Inpay A/S to Stop New Gambling Client Relationships After AML Breaches
AI-generated illustration.

TL;DR — Finanstilsynet ordered Inpay A/S to cease new relationships with online gambling firms after a March 2026 inspection revealed AML failures in due diligence, risk assessment and monitoring. The restriction spares existing clients but blocks sector growth until remediation is proven. It extends gambling oversight directly into payment infrastructure.

SCCG Take — Payment providers with heavy gambling exposure must now treat licensing verification and cross-border risk mapping as core compliance duties or face direct business limits.

Finanstilsynet has ordered Danish payments company Inpay A/S to stop establishing new business relationships with online gambling companies after identifying serious breaches of the Money Laundering Act. The formal order, published in August, follows an anti-money-laundering inspection completed in March 2026. It does not revoke Inpay’s licence or disrupt service to existing customers but blocks any addition of new gambling-sector clients until the deficiencies are corrected.

The restriction first appeared on 20 August as a voluntary measure by the company. The regulator’s published decision confirms a binding order underpins it. As reported by Casino News Daily, the case demonstrates how gambling-related supervision now reaches the payment infrastructure that supports operators rather than stopping at the licensees themselves.

Shortcomings in Due Diligence and Monitoring

Inpay operates as a Danish e-money institution authorised under the Payments Act, with a substantial part of its activity tied to cross-border payments for corporate clients in online gambling. Finanstilsynet identified three core failures: insufficient due diligence when a client’s circumstances changed, inadequate assessment of the purpose and intended nature of relationships with gambling clients classed as high risk, and weaknesses in ongoing monitoring.

These gaps affected the majority of Inpay’s gambling clients. Those clients represent a significant share of the company’s total transaction volume. Many are based outside Denmark and, in some instances, outside the EU. The firm also lacked visibility into deposits made by the gambling operators’ end users. Finanstilsynet concluded the deficiencies created a material risk of misuse for illegal gambling or unlicensed payment services.

Enforcement Reach Into Financial Infrastructure

The Inpay order aligns with a wider supervisory trend. Norway restricts banks from processing payments tied to unauthorised gambling operators and has deployed DNS blocking for unlicensed sites. The two tools differ: one limits site access while the other interrupts the financial flows that enable deposits and withdrawals.

The European Banking Authority guidelines on ML/TF risk factors list involvement in the gambling sector as an element that can elevate money-laundering risk. Finanstilsynet expects payment providers to understand client ownership structures, licensing status and cross-border exposures. The restriction on Inpay stays in force until the company supplies evidence that the identified breaches have been fixed. No deadline has been set.

This decision places concrete compliance obligations on intermediaries that sit between operators and the banking system. Licensed Danish gambling operators remain subject to the Gambling Act and oversight by the Danish Gambling Authority, but payment firms must now demonstrate equivalent diligence on the same client base.

Reporting: Casino News Daily

Generated by SCCG’s automated editorial system from published source reporting. SCCG Management holds editorial responsibility.

Steve’s read · SCCG Intelligence

Payment rails are now enforcement targets — regulators will choke off infrastructure, not just operators, when AML fails.

We've partnered with payment processors across 545 deals in every regulated market. When Finanstilsynet blocks new gambling clients at the infrastructure layer, it signals a global shift: compliance failures upstream now kill growth downstream. Operators and vendors must vet their payment stack as rigorously as their own licenses.

SCCG angle: SCCG vets payment and fintech partners across 30-plus markets. When a client scales, we map regulatory exposure in their payment stack and connect them to infrastructure providers with proven compliance track records in each jurisdiction — before a regulator imposes a freeze.

SCCG Media · Daily briefing

Gaming, betting and prediction markets — the desk’s read, every weekday.

Subscribe →

Related

SponsoredCoinsPaid — SCCG partnerVICI Properties Extends Annual Dividend Growth Streak with 2.2 Percent Increase to $1.84 Per ShareLeadership Transitions Reshape Prediction Markets and Canadian Gaming Operations
Curated by SCCG · Powered by SCCG Technology