CFTC Sues Arkansas to Halt State Enforcement Against CFTC-Regulated Event Contract Markets
The CFTC sued Arkansas after AG Tim Griffin targeted Kalshi on Nov. 4 for alleged illegal gambling. The agency argues event contracts are CEA-regulated swaps, preempting state action. This is the 11th such suit, backed by prior federal court injunctions.
SCCG Take — The filing reinforces uniform federal oversight of prediction markets, limiting state-level barriers for compliant operators while exposing persistent jurisdictional friction.
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) filed a lawsuit against Arkansas to block the state's efforts to shut down event-contract trading by Kalshi, a CFTC-designated contract market. The federal complaint argues that Arkansas's enforcement action is preempted by the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and intrudes on exclusive federal authority over these markets.
Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin filed suit on November 4 in the Circuit Court of Independence County. The state complaint accuses Kalshi of running an illegal, unregulated gambling platform in violation of the Arkansas Deceptive Trade Practices Act by allowing wagers on events and sports without a state license, taxes, or aligned age restrictions. It seeks to recover money obtained from Arkansas consumers, impose civil penalties, and halt operations.
CFTC Position on Event Contracts as Regulated Swaps
The CFTC's 34-page complaint states that the targeted event contracts qualify as swaps under the CEA. Kalshi operates lawfully as a CFTC-regulated designated contract market offering CFTC-approved products. The agency asserts that state attempts to obstruct these functions interfere with the uniform federal scheme Congress established for U.S. commodity derivatives markets.
CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig said in a statement: "As prediction markets continue to prove their value in being useful for risk management and providing the public with valuable information about the future, Arkansas seeks to shut down event contracts ranging from sports and politics to other important world events." Selig stressed that the CFTC would "defend its sole jurisdiction over these federally regulated markets as granted by Congress under the CEA, and the CFTC will not let state interference thwart its regulatory efforts and destroy federally regulated markets."
The CFTC noted it holds discretionary authority to approve or disapprove event contracts based on whether they are contrary to the public interest. As reported by CDC Gaming, this is the 11th state the agency has sued to vindicate its jurisdiction. The CFTC has also submitted amicus briefs in four federal Courts of Appeal and one state Supreme Court. Several federal courts, including the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, have issued or affirmed orders barring states from enforcing gambling laws against CFTC-regulated exchanges.
Gaming, betting and prediction markets — the desk’s read, every weekday.
Subscribe →