
Three people linked to the Conservative party have been sentenced for committing offences under Section 42 of the Gambling Act 2005 after using inside information to place bets before Rishi Sunak publicly announced it on 22 May 2024 according to the Gambling Commission. This is a significant case and a first of its kind for the Commission.
SCCG Take — The outcome demonstrates the Commission’s willingness to pursue criminal charges for insider election betting. Operators must maintain rigorous PEP flagging procedures to support enforcement and preserve market fairness.
Three individuals linked to the UK Conservative Party have received suspended sentences after using inside information to bet on the date of the 2024 general election. Anthony Lee, the party’s then-director of campaigning, his wife Laura Lee, and former staffer Amy Hind placed wagers before Rishi Sunak announced the date on 22 May 2024. The convictions under Section 42 of the Gambling Act 2005 mark a significant enforcement step by the regulator.
The scandal became a political embarrassment for the Conservative party in the leadup to the general election. It came to light after Ladbrokes referred the bets placed by former Conservative MP Craig Williams to the Gambling Commission after flagging him as a Politically Exposed Person (PEP).
Anthony Lee and Laura Lee placed bets worth more than £2,000 that would have returned £23,000. Amy Hind placed four bets and attempted three more that could have netted £26,000. The court imposed a 10-month-and-2-week sentence on Anthony Lee, a 4-month-and-2-week sentence on Laura Lee, and a 6-month sentence on Hind. All three terms were suspended for 12 months.
Each must complete unpaid community service. They face a 12-month ban from online gambling sites. The Lees were also ordered to pay £1,000 each in prosecution costs. The sentences follow charges against 15 people in the wider investigation. Williams pleaded guilty earlier this year and awaits separate sentencing. Remaining trials are listed for 2027 and 2028.
Katharine Diamond, general counsel at the Gambling Commission, called the matter “a significant case and a first of its kind for the Commission.” She stated that betting markets “must be fair and must not be undermined by people using confidential information for their own benefit.” Diamond added that the convictions show the importance of acting on evidence of cheating and that the Commission will continue to investigate suspected criminal activity.
The case highlighted the growing importance of real-time monitoring and collaboration between regulators and industry, according to reporting by iGaming Business.
Reporting: iGaming Business (iGB)
Generated by SCCG’s automated editorial system from published source reporting. SCCG Management holds editorial responsibility.
Gaming, betting and prediction markets — the desk’s read, every weekday.
Subscribe →