
Sportsbook-backed PACs linked to DraftKings, FanDuel, Fanatics, and Bet365 have resumed advertising for the November 3 midterms after a summer pause. Nearly $100 million has flowed into these groups, targeting state races in multiple states without disclosing industry ties. The focus is on influencing legislatures that control gambling rules.
SCCG Take — State legislatures hold the decisive power over sportsbook operations. This PAC strategy underscores the need for operators to treat political funding as core regulatory risk management.
Political action committees backed by major US sportsbook operators have resumed digital advertising as the November 3 midterm elections approach. The groups paused activity on Meta and Google platforms over the summer before restarting on October 6. Betting companies have poured almost $100 million into these committees over the past year.
The committees are funded by DraftKings, FanDuel, Fanatics, and Bet365. The American Future PAC has committed at least $30,000 to 10 races in Alabama, Illinois, Georgia, and Maryland. According to Gambling News, the PAC has also spent heavily on television and direct mail without disclosing its sports betting ties or addressing gambling legislation.
Win for America PAC serves as the primary conduit for operator contributions. DraftKings, Fanatics, and Bet365 provided a combined $9.65 million between July and September. FanDuel did not participate in that round but had previously contributed enough to reach a $27 million total, including a $7.5 million investment reported earlier.
The American Future PAC paid $347,343 for digital advertising, $194,007 for TV placements, and $54,920 for mailings. It targets Democratic candidates with messages on immigration and gun control while criticizing Republicans, such as Maryland Republican Barry Beauchamp on property taxes. The American Conservative Fund PAC received $5.9 million from the network and earlier sent $200,000 to an Arizona Republican PAC.
Previous spending exceeded $20 million on primary campaigns in at least six states. State legislatures set the rules on sportsbook legality, taxes, and operating conditions. With thousands of state legislative seats contested on November 3, the renewed efforts seek to shape outcomes that affect industry operations.
Where Transparency Risks Emerge
The ads avoid any mention of sports betting connections, which limits direct accountability. This approach secures influence over regulatory decisions without inviting immediate scrutiny on gambling-specific issues. Operators and regulators alike will need to assess whether such funding channels alter legislative priorities in the next cycle.
Reporting: GamblingNews
Generated by SCCG’s automated editorial system from published source reporting. SCCG Management holds editorial responsibility.
Gaming, betting and prediction markets — the desk’s read, every weekday.
Subscribe →