Southern District of New York Dismisses Three Antitrust Suits Targeting Fanatics and NFL Licensing Arrangements

Fanatics and the NFL secured dismissals in three antitrust lawsuits filed in the Southern District of New York. Federal judges ruled that the plaintiffs failed to establish the concrete harm to competition or consumers required under antitrust law.

The outcomes affirm that sports leagues retain discretion to select licensing and retail partners, even when those choices exclude certain distributors or limit product availability. Exclusive arrangements alone do not violate the Sherman Act absent demonstrated injury to the marketplace.

Standing and Evidence Shortfalls in Trading Card Litigation

In Jones et al. v. Fanatics et al., U.S. District Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed claims that Fanatics abused monopoly power in NFL and NBA trading cards. Plaintiffs never purchased NFL cards and offered no credible allegation they would do so. Their NBA claims rested on theoretical reductions in choice rather than personal harm.

Swain rejected the plaintiffs’ price and quality arguments. Evidence drawn from three Reddit threads, a YouTube podcast, a blog-style article, and complaints of dinged corners on Topps NBA cards fell short of the empirical rigor needed. The plaintiffs themselves did not claim to have experienced the alleged defects.

Lawful Exercise of Licensing Discretion

In Casey’s Distributing Inc. v. NFL, Fanatics et al. and Franz v. NFL, Fanatics et al., U.S. District Judge Andrew Carter Jr. rejected claims of unlawful collusion to boycott competing retailers of NFL-licensed goods. Carter wrote that antitrust law protects competition, not competitors. The Nebraska distributor showed injury to itself but alleged nothing adequate on consumer price increases or market-wide harm.

Carter observed that the NFL and Fanatics may lawfully cooperate on licensing official products. Any monopoly in such products existed before the alleged scheme and continues lawfully. As reported by Sportico, the rulings clarify that leagues and partners hold latitude to structure deals for quality control without automatic antitrust liability.

Fanatics raised money at a $31 billion valuation in December 2022 and is on track for $14 billion in revenue this year. A company spokesperson said the firm would continue to defend against what it called opportunistic claims.

Reporting: Sportico

Generated by SCCG’s automated editorial system from published source reporting. SCCG Management holds editorial responsibility.