
A capacity G2E panel addressed sports betting integrity after UFC and NBA match-fixing cases. Panelists from New Jersey, BetMGM, Genius Sports, and the NFL called for shared education, law enforcement coordination, and technology to monitor threats. One attendee labeled the concept an oxymoron.
SCCG Take — Operators and leagues must convert panel consensus into standardized exclusion lists and joint monitoring protocols or risk sustained patron distrust across jurisdictions.
A panel discussion at the Global Gaming Expo drew a standing-room-only audience of gaming operators, regulators, and journalists, including a national reporter from ESPN. The session responded directly to match-fixing headlines this year involving the UFC and the NBA. Every panelist agreed on one core requirement: patrons need confidence in the system.
Louis Rogacki, an assistant attorney general from New Jersey, called for close cooperation among all responsible agencies. Sarah Brennan, vice president of compliance with BetMGM, stated that no single stakeholder possesses full visibility. “No stakeholder has visibility over all elements and we can’t do it alone,” Brennan said. “Our role is not to monitor match fixing. Our role is to take that information and tie into law enforcement to get the information where it needs to go.”
Chris Dougan, chief government affairs officer at Genius Sports, described education as fundamental. His firm examines teams, players, and anyone who touches the game. Dougan cited annual education sessions held with every Professional Golf Association player.
Keith Perschetz, the NFL’s director of global sports betting, reported that the league educates some 2,000 players annually, with doubled sessions for rookies conducted by veteran players. Perschetz noted an uptick in harassment of players, coaches, and officials. “There is no place in the game for harassment,” Perschetz said. The panel urged permanent nationwide bans for those issuing threats and recommended placement on exclusion lists comparable to Nevada’s “Black Book.”
Dougan framed sports betting integrity as a global issue extending from the English Premier League to the NFL. He identified technology as critical for detecting money laundering, suspicious betting patterns, threats, and intimidation. Rogacki dismissed eliminating micro betting as a viable fix, instead repeating the call for coordination and education.
One regulator leaving the session called sports betting integrity an oxymoron, according to reporting by CDC Gaming. The exchange made clear that while education, information-sharing, and enforcement tools have broad support, translating consensus into consistent practice remains unfinished.
Reporting: CDC Gaming
Generated by SCCG’s automated editorial system from published source reporting. SCCG Management holds editorial responsibility.
Gaming, betting and prediction markets — the desk’s read, every weekday.
Subscribe →