SCCG · Responsible Gaming

Ohio iGaming Bill Sponsor Targets 2027 Window After DeWine Departure

insightsfreshnorth-america
Ohio iGaming Bill Sponsor Targets 2027 Window After DeWine Departure
AI-generated illustration.

Rep. Brian Stewart sees no movement on Ohio iGaming before year-end but anticipates a 2027 opening once Gov. Mike DeWine leaves. HB 298 limits licenses to existing casinos and racinos, sets a 28% tax with 99% to general revenue, and restricts online promotions. Problem gambling safeguards remain the decisive legislative hurdle.

SCCG Take — The 2027 transition demands concrete consumer-protection measures to convert openness from both gubernatorial nominees into enacted policy that protects incumbent operators.

Ohio iGaming legislation faces long odds in the current session but holds a clearer path with DeWine’s departure in January 2027. Rep. Brian Stewart, sponsor of House Bill 298, outlined the obstacles during an iDevelopment and Economic Association webinar. The bill’s design already previews how supporters plan to answer legislative concerns over revenue replacement, market cannibalization, and problem gambling.

Bill Structure Limits Competition

HB 298, introduced in May 2025 and stalled in the House Finance Committee, would authorize internet gambling regulated by the Ohio Casino Control Commission. It sets a 28% tax on receipts, directing 99% to the General Revenue Fund and 1% to the Problem Gambling Fund. Licenses would go only to the state’s four casinos and seven racinos.

That closed-market approach directly addresses fears that national operators would erode local employment and tax contributions. The bill also bars promotional credits for online play while allowing them when tied to in-person gaming, lodging, food, beverages, or entertainment. Stewart noted this framework minimizes intramural fights by advancing iGaming before any push for video lottery terminals.

Outlook for 2027

Consumer protection forms the most persistent barrier. Stewart said many legislators remain skeptical of gambling expansion, with older members especially resistant. He cited the always-on nature of online play as a core objection, quoting the view that players can gamble undetected on phones in ways land-based venues prevent. As reported by SBC Americas, stronger problem-gambling programs will be required to sway enough votes.

Gov. Mike DeWine has consistently opposed the measure, linking it to regrets over sports betting. His exit opens the door. Democratic nominee Amy Acton has expressed conditional support paired with advertising limits and youth safeguards. Republican nominee Vivek Ramaswamy has not detailed an iGaming stance but has stressed income-tax elimination, an area where estimates of $400m in annual iGaming revenue could factor.

Any renewed 2027 proposal must still demonstrate net new revenue without damaging the existing casino and racino base. That test will determine whether the preview in HB 298 becomes the foundation for actual legalization.

Reporting: SBC Americas

Generated by SCCG’s automated editorial system from published source reporting. SCCG Management holds editorial responsibility.

SCCG Media · Daily briefing

Gaming, betting and prediction markets — the desk’s read, every weekday.

Subscribe →

Related

SponsoredBeyond Bancard — SCCG partnerUAE Gaming Regulator Applies Crown Resorts Experience to Stress Operator CollaborationVirginia Experts Flag Seniors as Overlooked Group at Risk of Gambling Harm
Curated by SCCG · Powered by SCCG Technology