
Genting Casinos UK warns that a proposed doubling of machine duty from 20 per cent to 40 per cent would add about £16m a year and render 13 of 32 casinos unprofitable or unsustainable, risking more than 850 jobs plus around 50 support roles. Modelling indicates that the revenue lost through closures would outweigh the additional machine duty collected.
SCCG Take — Policymakers must model net fiscal effects including venue closures rather than isolated rate rises. This exposes limits to cost absorption in the regulated UK casino sector.
Genting Casinos UK has warned that 13 of its 32 British casinos would become unprofitable if the Treasury doubles gaming machine duty from 20 per cent to 40 per cent. The operator outlined the impact in an opinion piece, citing added annual costs of £16m and risks to employment across multiple sites.
Paul Willcock, CEO of Genting Casinos UK, detailed the projections. The change would place more than 850 venue jobs and around 50 support roles at risk. Modelling shows closures could follow at the affected locations.
Casinos employ croupiers, chefs, bar staff, cleaners, security officers, customer-service teams and managers. These positions require training, experience and opportunities to progress.
Willcock said: “Tax policy must also consider the distinction between regulated and unregulated gambling. It would be wrong to overstate or assume a direct displacement effect. But if highly regulated, visible operators and venues become less viable, the government should assess where demand may move and what that could mean for consumer protection.”
He added: “Before making any change, the Treasury should assess the impact on individual venues, employment, investment, city-centre regeneration, the visitor economy, consumer protection and total tax receipts.”
Further analysis indicates closures would eliminate a range of tax payments. Willcock said: “Our modelling indicates that the revenue lost through closures would outweigh the additional machine duty collected from the remaining venues. The Treasury could raise the rate and still receive less overall, while hundreds of skilled employees lose their jobs.”
He concluded: “A policy that turns investment into closures is not pro-growth. A tax rise that costs jobs, weakens regulated venues and ultimately raises less revenue is not reform. It is self-defeating. You cannot tax a casino that has closed.”
As reported by G3 Newswire, the intervention urges full evaluation of outcomes before any duty adjustment proceeds.
Reporting: G3 Newswire
Generated by SCCG’s automated editorial system from published source reporting. SCCG Management holds editorial responsibility.
Gaming, betting and prediction markets — the desk’s read, every weekday.
Subscribe →