
The Ohio Casino Control Commission exited the NCPG in June over its $2 million Kalshi partnership and a $5 million fine for unlicensed operations. Michigan and Nevada have also departed while Massachusetts retains membership short-term but signals possible future review. This reflects regulators’ view that the affiliation conflicts with responsible gambling standards.
SCCG Take — Regulators are enforcing clear lines on unlicensed activity even within responsible gaming groups. Prediction market operators must resolve legal disputes to avoid industry isolation.
The Ohio Casino Control Commission withdrew its membership from the National Council on Problem Gambling in June. This makes the OCCC the third confirmed regulator to sever ties with the organization over its partnership with prediction market operator Kalshi. News of the departure emerged at a Massachusetts Gaming Commission meeting last week.
Interim Executive Director Andromeda Morrison sent the letter ending the membership. Kalshi secured a $2 million investment from the NCPG in May. This came one month after the OCCC fined the company $5 million for unlicensed sports gaming.
Morrison wrote that the Commission must not associate with organizations linked to companies engaged in illegal gambling in Ohio. The letter states Kalshi violates state law and operates like any other black market sports betting platform. It creates consumer confusion about protections compared with licensed sportsbooks.
The OCCC letter argues the NCPG partnership stands in direct conflict with responsible gambling principles. Morrison emphasized that the NCPG seeks to legitimize an illegal sportsbook operating in Ohio. This undercuts the Commission’s efforts to eliminate unlicensed gambling.
The letter demands immediate removal of all affiliation references. No OCCC employees will serve on the NCPG board or attend its events. These steps reflect the regulator’s firm view on the incompatibility.
The Michigan Gaming Control Board withdrew in July with similar objections. Executive Director Henry Williams said treating internet sports betting as a means of financial gain increases the risk of irresponsible and problem gambling behavior. The Nevada Council on Problem Gambling also exited. Its executive director Trey Delap does not believe the organizations are aligned.
The Massachusetts Gaming Commission voted to retain membership for now. Its director of research and responsible gaming Mark Vander Linden recommended continuation after talks with NCPG leadership. Commissioners voiced reservations despite the short-term decision.
Commissioner Nakisha Skinner leaned toward cutting ties but did not want to be selective. Commissioner Eileen O’Brien cited concerns over the accepted funds and ongoing litigation. Chair Jordan Maynard stated that the NCPG should be on notice. The commission will stand for its values and hold their feet to the fire at renewal.
The developments expose limits in the NCPG’s neutrality position when regulators see direct legal conflicts. Further exits could weaken coordinated responsible gaming initiatives. Prediction market operators face narrower paths to legitimacy with state commissions.
Reporting: Legal Sports Report
Generated by SCCG’s automated editorial system from published source reporting. SCCG Management holds editorial responsibility.
Gaming, betting and prediction markets — the desk’s read, every weekday.
Subscribe →