
KSA granted Lotto B.V. three exclusive five-year licences for lotteries, scratch cards and land-based sports betting. A pending Council of State appeal on monopoly fairness may lead to exclusivity revocation or full review, with changes delayed at least one year post-ruling. This reflects political momentum to end state gambling ownership.
SCCG Take — Regulators and operators must track the Council of State ruling, which could force licence restructuring or market liberalisation within a defined timeline.
The Dutch Gambling Commission (KSA) has handed three exclusive licences to Lotto B.V., each running for five years. The licences cover lottery games, scratch cards and land-based sports betting.
Lotto B.V., which in 2016 merged with Staatsloterij to create state-owned holding company Nederlandse Loterij while retaining its standalone operations. The awards come as an appeal challenging the competitive fairness of the Dutch gambling monopoly proceeds before the Administrative Jurisdiction Division of the Council of State.
The KSA had preferred to wait for a final court ruling on the monopoly’s sustainability. It moved forward with the new licences only because the existing permits were nearing their deadline, ensuring no interruption to legal supply.
A ruling against the current structure could trigger several changes. The exclusive status might be revoked if a broader licensing regime is introduced for these products. The licences could continue without exclusivity, or a full review would follow any decision to abolish the state monopoly and privatise Nederlandse Loterij or Holland Casino.
Any amendments to Lotto B.V.’s licence status will not take effect earlier than one year after the Council of State’s decision. This situation adds to existing political pressure to end government ownership of gambling assets, a path already taken by Sweden in its liquidation of the Casino Cosmopol estate.
The KSA’s decision preserves continuity in the short term while leaving longer-term exclusivity open to judicial and legislative outcomes. The case tests whether the monopoly meets standards of competitive fairness under Dutch law. A decision to open the market would require fresh licensing processes and could alter the operational footing for the current state-backed holder.
Reporting: Lottery Daily
Generated by SCCG’s automated editorial system from published source reporting. SCCG Management holds editorial responsibility.
Gaming, betting and prediction markets — the desk’s read, every weekday.
Subscribe →