
Nebraska officials Mike Foley and Joey Spellerberg are leading Save Nebraska Sports to oppose online betting ballot measures, arguing operators like FanDuel and DraftKings would take most revenue. Sportsbooks spent over $7 million on signatures for the November 3, 2026 vote. A yes outcome requires commission rules by June 1, 2027 for up to 12 mobile licenses.
SCCG Take — The split exposes revenue share disputes that could sway voters and complicate operator licensing in ballot states.
Some Nebraska officials are taking a firm stance against legalizing online sports betting, seeking to block two ballot measures that would create a regulated iGaming framework in the state.
The Save Nebraska Sports initiative is backed by State Auditor Mike Foley and Treasurer Joey Spellerberg. It directly challenges Tax Relief Nebraska, which supports the measures as a way to generate tax revenue for local communities and deliver millions in property tax relief. Foley has rejected that position, arguing that companies such as FanDuel and DraftKings would pocket the bulk of the proceeds while the state receives “pennies.”
According to GamblingNews, major sportsbooks have spent more than $7 million gathering signatures to place the measures on the November 3, 2026 referendum. If approved by voters, the Nebraska Racing and Gaming Commission would have until June 1, 2027 to present rules enabling online wagers.
A legalized framework would permit up to 12 statewide mobile sportsbooks, with two licenses tethered to each of the state’s six gaming venues. Operators would not be required to activate every license. DraftKings, FanDuel, Fanatics, and BetMGM have supported the signature drive, viewing the opportunity as valuable for expanding regulated sports betting across the United States. TheScore Bet and Bet365 could also enter as the market develops.
The competing campaigns highlight a core tension between immediate budget relief and long-term allocation of gambling revenue that voters will ultimately decide.
Reporting: GamblingNews
Generated by SCCG’s automated editorial system from published source reporting. SCCG Management holds editorial responsibility.
We've seen ballot measures win and lose on messaging, not merit. When state officials frame operators as greedy outsiders pocketing revenue while communities get pennies, that narrative sticks with voters. Nebraska's fight is a template for how opposition campaigns will attack operator-funded initiatives nationwide.
SCCG angle: SCCG has navigated ballot campaigns and stakeholder opposition in multiple states. We connect operators to local coalition-builders, tribal partners, and political strategists who can reframe revenue arguments and build credible grassroots support before opposition narratives harden.
Gaming, betting and prediction markets — the desk’s read, every weekday.
Subscribe →