
LHGP urges DCMS to ban licensed gambling sponsorship in sports and extend curbs to digital ads, citing the balloon effect, data targeting, and links to higher harm including suicides. The £9m consortium joins multiple reform groups amid £2bn annual ad spend. Consultation closed 9 September with decision pending.
SCCG Take — Momentum for broad advertising restrictions could shrink operator sponsorship and marketing options in sports and online. Regulators must resolve Big Tech enforcement if bans are to prove effective beyond licensed channels.
The Local Health and Global Profits (LHGP) research consortium has urged the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) to extend its proposed ban on unlicensed gambling sponsorship in sport to regulated operators.
While welcoming the black market measure as a “necessary step”, LHGP pressed DCMS “to go further to meaningfully reduce gambling-related harm”. The call comes just over two years after the creation of the £9m, five-year consortium funded by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI). Its partners include the Universities of Bath, Cambridge, Edinburgh and Sheffield.
The DCMS consultation closed last Wednesday (9 September). Licensed industry bodies including the Betting and Gaming Council (BGC) and Entain have backed action against unlicensed sponsorships while urging rapid decisions. Entain wrote to ten Premier League clubs with unlicensed ties. Sunderland AFC nonetheless signed a deal with Shuffle, an unlicensed crypto casino, days later.
LHGP states that constant advertising exposure correlates with increased gambling behaviour and suicide rates, particularly among vulnerable groups and young people.
The consortium highlighted the “balloon effect” in which restrictions in one channel simply redirect marketing budgets elsewhere. It recommended that DCMS also ban gambling advertising on online and digital platforms.
“Digitalisation has transformed gambling marketing, allowing companies to use data-driven targeting, algorithms and “nudge” tactics that are barely touched by current policy and that give operators disproportionate power to drive habitual gambling,” the consortium stated.
Claims by tech billionaires that they are incapable of stopping non-GamStop ads appearing on their platforms are nonsensical and their inaction massively undermines the efforts that the rest of us are putting in place.
The position aligns with calls from the Social Market Foundation, Royal Society of Public Health and the Coalition to End Gambling Ads, which counts support from over 15 local councils. Liverpool City Council joined the network in July, citing the industry’s estimated £2bn annual advertising spend.
Dr Nason Maani, LHGP Deputy Director, said the gambling industry “has a well-documented history of using delay and lobbying tactics to weaken or block regulation that threatens its commercial interests.” Government must ensure the timeline “is not diluted or delayed by industry pressure.”
Practical enforcement against platforms such as Meta and ByteDance remains unresolved. Any extension of the ban would further constrain sponsorship inventory for licensed operators while testing regulatory reach over digital channels.
Reporting: SBC News
Generated by SCCG’s automated editorial system from published source reporting. SCCG Management holds editorial responsibility.
LHGP's push signals a widening coalition targeting licensed operators, not just black market actors. With £2bn in annual ad spend at risk and the balloon effect in play, operators face a fractured marketing landscape where digital enforcement remains fiction. We're watching how tech accountability — or lack of it — reshapes the entire regulatory playbook.
SCCG angle: SCCG helps clients model marketing reallocations if sponsorship bans advance — leveraging our regulator, affiliate, and content network across 545 partners to build compliant, diversified spend strategies that work whether digital enforcement materializes or not.
Gaming, betting and prediction markets — the desk’s read, every weekday.
Subscribe →