Robinhood Reaches Agreement With Michigan Regulators to Immediately Cease Sports Event Contracts

Robinhood will remove its sports event contracts from Michigan effectively immediately under an agreement announced by the Michigan Gaming Control Board. The company must also close all open positions within 30 days. The court-approved deal does not concede any party’s legal position on whether these contracts are regulated by the CFTC as prediction markets operators contend or by state gaming authorities.

“This agreement is another win for Michigan consumers,” said MGCB Executive Director Henry Williams. “Sports wagering products should only be offered by operators who are licensed, regulated, and held accountable under Michigan law.” Williams added that officials are pleased Robinhood has agreed to step back from these unregulated products while courts address the broader legal questions.

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel stated that the priority throughout the litigation has been protecting consumers from exploitative practices and ensuring betting remains fair and regulated. Nessel expressed pride in the attorneys who secured the agreement that protects Michiganders as the case moves forward.

Robinhood Follows Kalshi Out of Michigan Sports Markets

Robinhood is the second prediction markets company to step back from offering sports in Michigan. A judge recently ordered Kalshi to stop and geofence the state. Both actions reflect the state’s effort to shield its regulated sports betting market.

The development follows an unfavorable ruling from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that appeared to clear a path for state-level enforcement against these operators. Kalshi has filed a long-shot request for an en banc rehearing. Robinhood’s negotiated exit arrives as legal battles continue nationwide, including potential Supreme Court review of related petitions from New Jersey and elsewhere.

Limits and Open Questions in the Current Framework

This stopgap leaves unresolved the core jurisdictional dispute between federal commodity rules and state gaming laws. Robinhood could return to Michigan if courts ultimately side with the CFTC position. The agreement therefore functions as a temporary shield rather than a permanent resolution.

According to reporting by SBC Americas, the arrangement may present a blueprint for operators and states awaiting higher-court guidance. States gain immediate consumer protections without awaiting final rulings. Operators secure a defined exit process that avoids admitting violations. How many other jurisdictions adopt similar negotiated pauses remains uncertain as the national litigation evolves.

Reporting: SBC Americas

Generated by SCCG’s automated editorial system from published source reporting. SCCG Management holds editorial responsibility.