
Massachusetts has opted to stay with the NCPG at least for now. The MGC agreed with the recommendation to maintain its “Silver”-level organizational membership with the NCPG at a cost of $2,500 for fiscal-year 2026 and expressed support for the NCPG’s mission. When it comes up for renewal, I’m sure we’ll have another conversation, said Jordan Maynard.
SCCG Take — This decision keeps responsible gaming channels open while flagging unresolved regulatory overlap with prediction markets. States should track Kalshi’s appeals before committing to similar partnerships.
Massachusetts regulators have chosen to remain with the National Council on Problem Gambling (NCPG) for now. This sets the state apart from Michigan, Ohio, and Nevada, which withdrew their memberships after the NCPG accepted a controversial donation from prediction market platform Kalshi.
Massachusetts Gaming Commission (MGC) Chairman Jordan Maynard said the membership would likely face renewed discussion at renewal time. “When it comes up for renewal, I’m sure we’ll have another conversation,” Maynard said. The five-member commission expressed support for the NCPG’s mission while acknowledging the concerns raised by the donation.
The MGC holds a Silver-level organizational membership at a cost of $2,500 for fiscal-year 2026. Mark Vander Linden, the MGC’s director of research and responsible gaming, recommended continued membership after discussions with NCPG officials. The commission voted unanimously to follow that recommendation, though several members voiced reservations.
In May, the NCPG announced a $2 million donation from Kalshi. The funds support a new “trader health and safety” initiative and a “Financial Services and Trading” membership category. The Michigan Gaming Control Board withdrew, citing Kalshi’s litigation with Michigan and other states over unlicensed sports event contracts. The Ohio Casino Control Commission and Nevada Council on Problem Gambling took similar steps.
In Massachusetts, a judge issued a preliminary injunction blocking Kalshi from offering sports-event wagers. Kalshi paused enforcement of that order pending appeal to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. Vander Linden briefed the MGC on conversations with Heather Maurer, NCPG executive director, and Cole Wogoman, NCPG director of policy and partnerships. Maurer and Wogoman told Vander Linden that “The buying and selling of event-based futures contracts can carry risks similar to traditional gambling, including impulsive behavior, financial harm, and the potential for escalating gambling-related issues.” The NCPG executives said “NCPG remains neutral on the legality of gambling, wagering, and prediction markets. This initiative is not an endorsement of any products or platform.”
Commissioner Paul Brodeur said the core issue is how prediction markets are described and marketed while operating without regulation. “It’s gambling. It could be, I suspect, welcomed into the marketplace if they were another sports betting operator and approached their business that way,” Brodeur said. Commissioner Eileen O’Brien agreed Kalshi occupies a gray area overlapping with regulated activities. O’Brien stated there “may come a time sooner, rather than later, where we need to quit.”
Both commissioners urged continued monitoring of developments with Kalshi and the NCPG partnership. The MGC’s current stance leaves open the possibility of future withdrawal once the legal and regulatory picture clarifies.
Reporting: CDC Gaming
Generated by SCCG’s automated editorial system from published source reporting. SCCG Management holds editorial responsibility.
We track these fault lines closely. When prediction markets blur into sports betting and state regulators split on RG partnerships, it signals deeper regulatory fragmentation ahead. SCCG works across every U.S. jurisdiction—we help clients navigate the overlap between compliance, perception, and policy before it becomes a headline.
SCCG angle: SCCG sits at the table in every regulated state and works with RG stakeholders across the industry. We help clients map regulatory sentiment state-by-state, connect with the right voices before policy hardens, and structure partnerships that hold up under scrutiny as lines between gaming verticals continue to blur.
Gaming, betting and prediction markets — the desk’s read, every weekday.
Subscribe →