
TL;DR — DraftKings named Kalshi in ads citing slow withdrawals and poor reviews, shortly after Kalshi reversed payouts on an $18.6M Western Michigan-Michigan market settled prematurely at 10:52 p.m. Kalshi faces sports contract bans in seven states. DraftKings offers sports betting in 26 states plus D.C. and Predictions elsewhere.
SCCG Take — Execution errors and multi-state restrictions create openings for licensed operators to differentiate on reliability and reach. Prediction platforms must now treat settlement precision as a core competitive requirement.
DraftKings has released two advertisements that name rival prediction market operator Kalshi and highlight its negative customer reviews. The ads focus on slow withdrawals, poor customer service and app reliability issues. They appeared days after Kalshi settled a college football market before the contest officially ended, forcing it to claw back payments.
The first ad runs 15 seconds and shows a skeleton waiting on a withdrawal alongside user reviews. One review states a trade had not closed after four days. Another says “don’t download” and “very hard to withdraw my money.” The ad carries the caption “Get fast withdrawals, 24/7 support and feel safe & secure with DraftKings Sports.”
The second ad runs 37 seconds and urges viewers to check App Store reviews before downloading. It surfaces Kalshi reviews calling customer service “terrible” and the app “slimey” and “shady.”
Kalshi began paying out Western Michigan winners at 10:52 p.m. on a market that generated $18.6 million in volume. Officials later added one second to the game clock, allowing Michigan’s game-winning Hail Mary for a 13-12 final. Kalshi had to reverse those payouts and pay the correct side. DraftKings did not settle the outcome until 11:17 p.m.
New NCAA guidelines call for use of the embedded game clock in the program feed. Had those rules applied, Western Michigan would have won 12-7 and Kalshi’s initial payouts would have stood.
Kalshi cannot offer sports contracts in Michigan after a court issued a temporary restraining order. It is also barred in Connecticut, Massachusetts, Nevada, New York, Utah and Washington. DraftKings operates in all 50 states, providing regulated sports betting in 26 states plus Washington D.C. In states without legal sports betting it offers DraftKings Predictions, including a recent free-gas promotion in California, Florida, Georgia and Texas.
Naming a competitor outright remains uncommon in the sector. The ads, first surfaced on X by @DataBasedBets, arrive as both platforms compete for users in an environment where speed, accuracy and regulatory access determine credibility. According to Legal Sports Report, the sequence illustrates how operational missteps can quickly become marketing vulnerabilities.
Reporting: Legal Sports Report
Generated by SCCG’s automated editorial system from published source reporting. SCCG Management holds editorial responsibility.
We've seen platforms stumble on settlement precision before, but reversing payouts on an $18.6M market is operational malpractice. When you add multi-state restrictions and withdrawal complaints, you create a credibility gap DraftKings exploited. This is about trust at scale—regulated operators can lean into reliability when unregulated competitors fumble basics.
SCCG angle: We've guided operators through competitive positioning and market-entry strategy in 29 jurisdictions. When rivals stumble on operations or state access, SCCG helps clients sharpen product reliability messaging and accelerate licensing in contested markets—turning competitor missteps into market-share opportunities.
Gaming, betting and prediction markets — the desk’s read, every weekday.
Subscribe →