
TL;DR — Brazil logged over 1.2 million self-exclusion registrations in eight months, or 3% of 40 million active Sigap bettors. The total exceeds absolute figures from GAMSTOP after eight years, Spelpaus after seven, and OASIS after four. Methodological variances in population base and counting limit direct comparisons.
SCCG Take — Rapid uptake in a newly regulated market shows platform accessibility works, yet varying metrics mean operators and regulators must avoid over-reading problem-gambling prevalence from headline totals alone.
Brazil’s centralized betting self-exclusion system has recorded more than 1.2 million voluntary exclusions in about eight months since launch. The total covers fixed-odds betting platforms authorized to operate in the country.
Data released by the Secretariat of Prizes and Betting of the Ministry of Finance shows that more than 1.2 million people had requested exclusion as of September 2026. The figure equals 3% of the 40 million active CPF registrations in the Betting Management System known as Sigap. The platform was created by the SPA and made available in December 2025.
Brazil’s totals surpass the accumulated registrations of several established national systems. The United Kingdom’s GAMSTOP took eight years to reach 614,738. Sweden’s Spelpaus required seven years to surpass 134. Germany’s OASIS took four years to exceed 336.
The Brazilian market has operated under regulation for just over a year and a half. Law 14.790/2023 came into effect in January 2025. As reported by Yogonet International, the centralized system reached these volumes in a shorter span than programs in jurisdictions with decades of regulated gambling.
The figures do not establish that Brazil has a proportionally higher level of gambling-related problems than the compared countries. Brazil’s 3% rate is calculated against active bettors in Sigap. Percentages published in the United Kingdom, Sweden, and the Netherlands are based on each country’s total adult population.
Differences also exist in how registrations are counted. Under Germany’s OASIS, the same person may self-exclude more than once. The scope of systems varies too. Spain’s RGIAJ covers only state-regulated online gambling, while the Brazilian registry covers all nationally licensed platforms.
Reporting: Yogonet International
Generated by SCCG’s automated editorial system from published source reporting. SCCG Management holds editorial responsibility.
We're watching Brazil's regulated market mature in real time. Over 1.2 million opt-outs in eight months tells us the system works and users trust it, but comparing it to GAMSTOP or Spelpaus is misleading — different denominators, different scopes. Operators entering Brazil must understand what these numbers actually mean for compliance and player safety design.
SCCG angle: SCCG has placed compliance, platform, and RG technology partners across five LatAm markets. If you're building or adapting for Brazil's Sigap environment, we connect you to the vendors who've already integrated and the local advisory teams who know how SPA enforcement actually works on the ground.
Gaming, betting and prediction markets — the desk’s read, every weekday.
Subscribe →