Dutch Parliamentary Debate Lays Bare Divisions on Remote Gaming Act Reforms
TL;DR — Dutch debate on KOA reforms showed MPs divided between calls for broader bans, faster illegal site blocks, and evidence-based age limits versus warnings that over-regulation fuels black markets. Van Bruggen outlined upcoming DNS blocking legislation and payment standards. This reveals persistent political friction in finalizing online gambling rules.
SCCG Take — Operators face tighter advertising limits and supervision as consensus forms on illegal market controls. Evidence requirements before age changes signal regulators’ caution against driving activity underground.
Dutch politicians clashed in parliament over the path forward for gambling legislation, exposing sharp divides on reforms to the Remote Gaming Act (KOA).
State Secretary of Justice Claudia van Bruggen responded to nine MPs who pressed distinct positions on player safeguards, illegal operators, and the shape of licensed online gambling, according to reporting by SBC News.
Divergent Positions on Enforcement and Age Limits
Mirjam Bikker of ChristenUnie called for a broader advertising ban, faster blocking of illegal websites, and details on the delayed increase of the minimum gambling age to 21. Van Bruggen agreed illegal sites require stronger action. She noted .nl domains can be removed easily but foreign domains fall outside direct jurisdiction.
Van Bruggen stated a draft law to widen DNS blocking powers is in development, with consultations planned for early 2027. On the age limit, she said an immediate jump to 21 could prove counterproductive and requires analysis to confirm it reduces harm rather than shifting youth to the black market.
Mohammed Mohandis of Progressive Netherlands (PRO) urged concrete annual indicators to measure policy success. He also asked about potential privatisation of the Nederlandse Loterij and pressed for action against financial intermediaries enabling illegal payments, a step recently highlighted by trade body VNLOK. Van Bruggen confirmed an ongoing study into privatisation effects by the Research and Data Center (WODC) and plans for clearer standards on what constitutes ‘facilitating’ illegal gambling.
Risks of Over-Regulation and Points of Overlap
Diederik van Dijk of the SGP party demanded full withdrawal of the online gambling act. He said the government should “turn off the tap” instead of “buying better mops,” called for a complete advertising ban across all gambling including land-based, and sought abolition of the Nederlandse Loterij. Van Bruggen rejected the proposals. She cited 500,000 Dutch citizens who gamble online monthly and argued pulling the legal offer would simply transfer demand to unregulated sites. She added the National Lottery carries a lower risk profile than other formats and kept the focus on online issues.
Joost Sneller of ruling party D66 acknowledged damage from re-regulation and called for political self-reflection. He warned against the “waterbed effect” in which over-regulation pushes players to illegal markets and urged a level-headed approach.
Coverage noted fundamental differences on reversing legalization but substantial overlap on illegal websites, supervision, advertising, duty of care, and Ksa powers. The direction of future policy is becoming clearer: stricter supervision, less space for online advertising, central financial protection, and much more attention to the illegal market.
Reporting: SBC News
Generated by SCCG’s automated editorial system from published source reporting. SCCG Management holds editorial responsibility.
Van Bruggen is threading the needle—blocking illegal sites and tightening ads while refusing changes that push players underground.
We work in every regulated market, and the Netherlands shows the core tension: politicians want visible action, but smart regulators know over-reach feeds the black market. Van Bruggen's caution on the age-21 jump and her focus on DNS blocking and payment rails—not symbolic bans—signals pragmatism. Operators need to read this friction closely.
- Van Bruggen drafting DNS blocking law for illegal sites; consultation early 2027
- Age-21 increase delayed pending evidence it won't drive youth to black market
- Payment facilitator standards and advertising limits tightening; privatisation study underway
SCCG angle: SCCG has deep relationships with Dutch licensees, payment providers, and regulators across Europe. We help clients navigate this exact friction—structuring compliant market entry, connecting you to the right legal and tech partners for DNS and payment standards, and positioning your advocacy before rules harden. We've done it in 30+ markets.
Gaming, betting and prediction markets — the desk’s read, every weekday.
Subscribe →