
TL;DR — Viage has appealed the Brussels casino licence award to Napoleon Games after the July 17 selection. The Auditor General recommends suspension over bid scoring gaps, incomplete evaluation details, and omitted EU foreign subsidy notifications on the €750m concession. The 91.02 to 87.74 point split is now under formal review.
SCCG Take — Public concession awards must demonstrate transparent scoring and full EU compliance to limit successful appeals and transition delays.
Viage has contested the award of the Brussels casino licence to Napoleon Games with the Belgian Council of State. The Auditor General has recommended suspending the appointment.
Brussels announced on July 17 that it selected Napoleon Games, a subsidiary of the Romanian group Superbet, from among six bids to run the country’s largest casino for 15 years starting January 1, 2027. The winning operator scored 91.02 out of 100, ahead of Viage’s 87.74. Viage is a subsidiary of Casinos Austria.
The appeal focuses on the evaluation methods for the bids. A significant discrepancy emerged on the criterion for the proposed vision for the casino’s future, with Napoleon Games awarded 30 points against Viage’s 20 points. Two other candidates received 25 points on that measure. Given the narrow gap in overall rankings, this score carried heavy weight in the outcome.
As reported by Journal des Casinos, Viage contests that certain elements required in the specifications were not analysed while others not included in them were taken into consideration. The relocation of servers tied to online gaming activities was one point raised. The City of Brussels has defended its evaluation method and maintains it holds authority to compare the bids fairly.
The Auditor General’s analysis questioned the decision-making process. The review found that candidates did not supply sufficiently detailed information to explain how scores were calculated. It also identified a lack of breakdown between certain sub-criteria, commitments that were not concrete enough, and several undated letters in Napoleon Games’ application. On multiple points the Auditor General determined that elements corresponding to the specifications were less developed in the Romanian operator’s bid than in Viage’s.
The tender further implicates European regulation on foreign subsidies. That framework requires reporting or notification to the European Commission when contract value reaches or exceeds €250m. The concession is estimated at €750m, well above the threshold. The Auditor General concluded that the city failed to set out these obligations in its tender documents and did not submit the required documentation to the Commission. The outcome of the Council of State review will determine whether the January 1, 2027 transition proceeds on schedule.
Reporting: G3 Newswire
Generated by SCCG’s automated editorial system from published source reporting. SCCG Management holds editorial responsibility.
We've guided clients through competitive casino concessions across Europe for three decades. When a €750m licence hangs on fractional scoring and the Auditor General flags evaluation gaps and foreign subsidy non-compliance, it's a reminder that technical rigour and regulatory homework win or lose these battles long before the appeal.
SCCG angle: SCCG has structured concession bids and regulatory strategies across 13 European markets. When scoring protocols and EU compliance paperwork determine who runs a €750m asset, we help operators build bulletproof applications and challenge weak awards with the right technical and legal firepower before the ink dries.
Gaming, betting and prediction markets — the desk’s read, every weekday.
Subscribe →