
TL;DR — A University of Nottingham study found gambling brands visible for 32% of Premier League YouTube highlight time versus under 2% for the World Cup. Unhealthy branding reached 38% of PL footage. This occurs despite voluntary shirt sponsorship limits and amid high YouTube use by UK children.
SCCG Take — Voluntary front-of-shirt rules leave most digital highlight exposure unaddressed, requiring operators and leagues to anticipate broader measures on embedded advertising.
A University of Nottingham pre-print study has quantified gambling brand visibility in football highlight packages on YouTube. Gambling brands appeared for 32% of total Premier League highlight screen time. This compares to less than 2% in analyzed 2026 World Cup highlights.
The researchers reviewed Sky Sports highlights from the last 10 games of the 2025/26 Premier League season and FIFA YouTube highlights from 17 World Cup matches. Unhealthy commodity branding overall, including gambling, alcohol and HFSS products, appeared in 38% of Premier League footage and 19% of World Cup footage.
Gambling was the leading unhealthy commodity category in the Premier League content. HFSS food and drink branding accounted for approximately 13% of World Cup highlight screen time. The data carries added weight because 81% of UK children aged three to 17 regularly use YouTube.
The Premier League states its content reaches 1.87 billion people through media each week. The 2022 FIFA World Cup engaged an estimated five billion people across platforms. Prior studies have linked exposure to unhealthy commodity advertising with increased consumption. Gambling-specific research has connected sports-related ads to higher betting frequency, spending and unplanned expenditure. Unlike conventional television commercials, branding embedded in match footage stays visible during goals, red cards and other key moments.
Only around one quarter of gambling brand appearances in the Premier League highlights were on the front of players’ shirts. The Premier League maintains a voluntary agreement that removes gambling sponsorship from that specific shirt position. This leaves the majority of observed branding outside the scope of that restriction.
Some highlight packages also included up to 30 seconds of gambling advertising before approximately three minutes of match footage. Lead author Nathan Davies highlighted the substantial potential scale of exposure at the start of the new football season. The University of Nottingham study is believed to be the first to compare unhealthy commodity branding in football YouTube highlights between the Premier League and World Cup, according to reporting by GamblingNews.
Where Current Rules Fall Short
The findings show that digital highlight formats generate significant branding exposure not captured by existing voluntary shirt sponsorship measures. Leagues and regulators will need to assess these channels directly as younger audiences shift toward on-demand content.
Reporting: GamblingNews
Generated by SCCG’s automated editorial system from published source reporting. SCCG Management holds editorial responsibility.
We've helped more than 545 partners navigate responsible marketing and compliance across every regulated market. When voluntary measures leave 75% of brand impressions untouched—especially in content reaching 1.87 billion weekly—operators need to model compliance scenarios beyond shirt logos and anticipate regulatory expansion into embedded, passive exposure.
SCCG angle: SCCG connects sponsors and leagues to compliance architects, responsible marketing consultants, and policy advisors who model regulatory risk across digital distribution channels. We help clients stress-test sponsorship ROI against probable restrictions and identify compliant activation alternatives before voluntary measures become mandatory bans.
Gaming, betting and prediction markets — the desk’s read, every weekday.
Subscribe →