Altenar Blocks Sportradar Bid to Move US Antitrust Suit to Zurich Arbitration
TL;DR — Altenar is resisting Sportradar’s motion to shift an antitrust lawsuit over US sports data access from New Jersey federal court to Zurich arbitration. The claims target alleged monopolization of NHL, NBA, MLB and ATP feeds under the Sherman Act. A parallel case against Sportradar was dismissed in April 2026.
SCCG Take — Contractual arbitration clauses face direct challenge when antitrust claims arise in sports data markets. The forum decision will set boundaries on how leagues’ commercial data partners may limit supply to competing tech providers.
Altenar has stated it will oppose all attempts by Sportradar to relocate an ongoing antitrust lawsuit from the US District Court for the District of New Jersey to private arbitration in Zurich. The dispute concerns data rights and controls for US professional sports leagues.
The Nasdaq-listed sports technology group is attempting to force arbitration under a clause from a master partnership agreement signed in 2021. Altenar filed the original suit in April accusing Sportradar of abusing its position as principal betting data supplier for the National Hockey League, National Basketball Association, Major League Baseball and Association of Tennis Professionals.
Data Supply and Sherman Act Claims
Sportradar stands accused of manipulating the price and availability of US sports data that Altenar says is essential to operating its sportsbook services. The claims allege this conduct restricts competition and breaches Section 2 of the Sherman Act. Court filings state that Sportradar is trying to maintain market dominance by unfairly eliminating competitors.
Altenar maintains the antitrust dispute belongs in federal court rather than private arbitration in Zurich. The company argues the 2021 agreement cannot be used to bypass the Sherman Act in the market it specifically carved out. Altenar seeks an injunction against the alleged refusal to supply live pro-league data plus damages of several million dollars.
This marks the second antitrust case against Sportradar in two years. In March 2025, Sportscastr expanded a patent infringement suit against Sportradar and Genius Sports to include anti-competitive complaints. Those antitrust claims were dismissed with prejudice by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 9 April 2026.
Altenar notes the action has played out alongside Sportradar’s launch of its own turnkey platform ORAKO and ownership of betting tech supplier NSoft, both of which compete directly with Altenar for operator contracts. According to reporting by SBC News, an Altenar spokesperson said: “Sportradar’s global headquarters are in Switzerland; it feels safe there. Its motion to send this case to confidential Swiss arbitration is a transparent attempt to shield itself from US justice and public scrutiny. Altenar looks forward to its day in court.”
Sportradar informed SBC News that it “does not comment on pending litigation.” The New Jersey court must now decide whether the claims proceed in US federal court or shift to arbitration.
Reporting: SBC News
Generated by SCCG’s automated editorial system from published source reporting. SCCG Management holds editorial responsibility.
Contractual arbitration clauses meet federal antitrust enforcement — where this case lands determines how data monopolies defend themselves.
We've structured data deals across every regulated state, and arbitration forum-selection is where monopoly defenses start. If Altenar keeps this in federal court, Sherman Act scrutiny becomes the playbook for any tech vendor locked out by exclusive league feeds. The ORAKO and NSoft overlap makes Sportradar both gatekeeper and competitor — textbook Section 2 exposure.
- Altenar accuses Sportradar of monopolizing NHL, NBA, MLB, ATP data under Sherman Act
- Sportradar invoking 2021 arbitration clause to move case from New Jersey to Zurich
- Parallel Sportscastr antitrust claims dismissed with prejudice April 2026
SCCG angle: SCCG has negotiated data-supply and platform agreements with both Altenar and competing providers across 30 regulated markets. When exclusivity or tiering clauses threaten client tech stacks, we map alternative feeds, co-counsel on antitrust risk, and structure fallback partnerships before supply gets cut. This case shows why forum and enforceability language matters as much as the commercial terms.
Gaming, betting and prediction markets — the desk’s read, every weekday.
Subscribe →