
TL;DR — The CFTC declared American-style odds misleading for prediction markets, citing hidden liquidity and market impact. DraftKings and FanDuel will comply by August 31. The letter supports the agency’s exclusive jurisdiction claims amid lawsuits with states over whether these are gambling products.
SCCG Take — The CFTC is using display rules to create transactional distinctions that strengthen its courtroom position. Operators should assess how format changes affect compliance risk and user behavior in this jurisdictional fight.
The CFTC has issued a letter declaring American-style odds misleading for event contracts traded on prediction markets. The guidance, published Friday, applies to designated contract markets as well as futures commission merchants and introducing brokers. DraftKings and FanDuel both default to this odds format on their prediction market apps and will comply by the August 31 deadline, as reported by InGame.
The CFTC cites rules on manipulative or misleading advertising. It states that American-style odds are “likely to mislead market participants about the nature of the transaction into which they are entering and may deprive users of access to indicia of market depth and pricing impact.” Displaying derivative contract prices directly, the letter adds, “provides market participants with accurate and relevant information” and “reflects that the prices of these derivatives products are determined by market forces on a regulated exchange.”
The letter argues that such odds hide liquidity and pricing impact that affect the true value of a trade. It references “nominal or percentage terms that reflect market pricing” as preferable but does not specify whether fractional or decimal odds would comply.
Benjamin Schiffrin, Director of Securities Policy for Better Markets, countered that the CFTC is trying to mask the gambling nature of these contracts. “The CFTC’s desire to help prediction markets avoid the inescapable conclusion that their event contracts on sporting events involve gambling knows no bounds,” Schiffrin said. He added that the move is “a desperate attempt to dupe people into thinking event contracts on sporting events are not the gambling devices they so clearly are.”
As @BetterMarkets posted on X: “The CFTC is now giving advice to prediction markets on how not to look too much like a sportsbook. Will the cheerleading ever stop?”
The letter arrives while the CFTC takes a larger role in litigation asserting exclusive jurisdiction over event contracts against state gambling laws. It recently issued an emergency order requiring Kalshi to continue trading if New York attempts to shut it down. The agency has also proposed rules for affiliated market makers that limit them to providing liquidity without taking directional positions.
Whether steps focused on appearances will produce more than cosmetic change in court remains to be seen.
Reporting: InGame
Generated by SCCG’s automated editorial system from published source reporting. SCCG Management holds editorial responsibility.
We've watched prediction markets grow from novelty to battleground. This letter isn't about clarity — it's courtroom strategy dressed as consumer protection. DraftKings and FanDuel must rewire UX by August while state AGs argue these are gambling products. The compliance surface just expanded, and user experience will suffer in the crossfire.
SCCG angle: SCCG helps operators thread this needle daily. We connect platforms to regulatory counsel who've litigated CFTC matters and product teams who've rebuilt odds engines under deadline. When format becomes a legal weapon, our network delivers the compliance architects and user experience specialists who keep you live and defensible.
Gaming, betting and prediction markets — the desk’s read, every weekday.
Subscribe →