
TL;DR — Kenya’s High Court partially lifted a July stay on new gambling regulations, letting the GRA resume licensing, due diligence, and oversight. Increased fees and Ksh100 million capital rules remain suspended. Full judicial review ends with judgment on 2 October. (48 words)
SCCG Take — Operators regain a licensing pathway under prior fees but face material cost exposure if the court upholds the hikes. The ruling buys time yet leaves investment certainty pending. (28 words)
The High Court of Kenya has partially lifted a stay order on the Gambling Control (Licensing) Regulations 2026, enabling the new Gambling Regulatory Authority to resume core functions. Justice William Musyoka issued the original stay in July after a challenge from Thomas Buckley Opar Owuor and Ken Brance. On Friday the court agreed with the government and the GRA that a complete suspension had created a regulatory vacuum.
Most provisions are now enforceable. The GRA may receive and process licence applications, conduct due diligence on operators, and carry out anti-money laundering and consumer-protection oversight. The full substantive judicial review continues, with written submissions due by 21 September and judgment scheduled for 2 October.
Increased licensing fees and the new gambling capital requirements stay suspended. Under the prior rules operators paid roughly Ksh10,000 ($77) for an application and between Ksh400,000 and Ksh1 million annually. The updated framework raised an online bookmaker application fee to Ksh5 million and the licence fee to Ksh50 million for a three-year term, with increases ranging from 200% to 49,900%. A Ksh100 million capital requirement for online bookmakers and iGaming operators was also introduced.
David Sarinke, partner at McKay Advocates, told iGaming Business the regulator is expected to issue guidance reverting to previous fees while the court decides the point. “Obviously, the reasonable thing to do is go back to the previous fees it was applying as a way for the court to make a determination on that point,” Sarinke said. The underlying suit argues the capital requirements may violate Article 10 of Kenya’s 2010 Constitution on public participation.
The original request for the stay warned that numerous operators doubted their ability to meet the higher fees and capital thresholds, with some reportedly considering closure. The challenge flagged risks to thousands of jobs, withdrawal of investment, and lower government tax revenues. These concerns remain live until the October judgment determines whether the suspended provisions will stand.
Reporting: iGaming Business (iGB)
Generated by SCCG’s automated editorial system from published source reporting. SCCG Management holds editorial responsibility.
We've guided partners through African market entries for three decades, and Kenya remains a high-volume, high-volatility play. This partial lift restores the licensing pipeline but defers the economic question—can operators absorb 200–49,900% fee increases and Ksh100 million capital floors? That answer dictates every investment thesis until autumn.
SCCG angle: SCCG maintains direct regulatory intelligence and local counsel relationships across Africa. If you hold a Kenya licence or are sizing entry, we connect you to on-the-ground advisors, help model fee-hike scenarios, and introduce alternative regional opportunities while the court decides. We don't wait for headlines—we position you ahead of the ruling.
Gaming, betting and prediction markets — the desk’s read, every weekday.
Subscribe →