
TL;DR — Jeffrey Lichtman, attorney for John A. Gotti and El Chapo, now represents Malik Beasley in the Eastern District match-fixing case. The court approved the change ahead of an Oct. 14 status conference and impending discovery. The same judge handles the related Terry Rozier matter where text evidence remains contested.
SCCG Take — High-profile counsel signals extended proceedings in these parallel prosecutions. Leagues and operators face continued federal focus on integrity risks tied to player betting networks.
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York approved high-profile defense attorney Jeffrey Lichtman as substitute counsel for Malik Beasley on Wednesday, the day before the Thursday status conference. Lichtman has represented ex-Gambino mob boss John A. Gotti and Sinaloa cartel leader “El Chapo.” His debut overshadowed any immediate discussion of the illegal sports betting charges.
Beasley is one of six co-defendants charged by federal prosecutors in late June on multiple federal counts surrounding match fixing. Prosecutors allege he altered his performance and shared information so bettors could profit. The next status conference is set for Oct. 14. Prosecutors expect to deliver the first round of discovery next week under a protective order.
The other defendants are Edward Davis, a 2010 first-round pick by the Toronto Raptors, William Brown, Robert Gorodetsky, Ernesto Plascencia, and NBA player agent Paolo Zamorano. Brown is a former college basketball player. Gorodetsky is a wagering whale who previously pled out in a case in which he was accused of embezzling funds he used to bet.
As @MattRybaltowski posted on X: “Robert Gorodetsky, a co-conspirator in the case against Malik Beasley, appears to be the same sports betting whale who faced federal charges in 2020 for defrauding an individual out of millions. Nicknamed \”Big Rob,\” Gorodetsky used at least $8.74 million in funds from an…”
The matter sits before Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall, who also oversees the illegal sports betting case against former NBA star Terry Rozier. According to ESPN, attorneys in the Rozier case dispute the meaning of a text exchange involving co-defendant DeNiro Laster. Per the filing: “Dont tell chum bout the bet,” Laster wrote. “Chum” is one of Rozier’s nicknames. The recipient answered, “Hell no.” Rozier’s counsel argues the exchange shows he lacked knowledge of the bet. Federal prosecutors state they have developed evidence from multiple sources that this text chain does not relate to sports gambling.
Rozier’s trial is set to begin Feb. 8, 2027. Two key co-conspirators, former NBA player and assistant coach Damon Jones and Marves Fairley, have already pleaded guilty. The cases illustrate ongoing federal attention to player and associate conduct in sports wagering.
Reporting: InGame
Generated by SCCG’s automated editorial system from published source reporting. Automated fact-checking and editorial checks run before publication; individual articles are not reviewed by an editor beforehand. SCCG Management holds editorial responsibility.
We've worked integrity and compliance in every regulated U.S. market, and I can tell you: federal prosecutors going after players, agents, and betting whales sends a clear message. Operators and leagues are on notice. The discovery timeline and overlapping prosecutions mean this stays in headlines — and on regulators' radar — for years.
SCCG angle: SCCG has deep relationships with integrity vendors, compliance counsel, and monitoring platforms across our 545-partner network. If you're an operator or league navigating federal scrutiny or tightening your player-conduct protocols, we connect you to the right partners fast — audit, monitoring, legal — so you stay ahead of the next wave of enforcement.