
TL;DR — CFTC proposed rules limit affiliate advantages at prediction markets by mandating last order priority, continuous two-sided quotes, separate operations, and independent oversight. At least six exchanges are affected. Public comments are due Oct. 5 following the post-FTX review.
SCCG Take — Operators must assess revenue exposure from restricted affiliate trading and prepare robust compliance structures. The rules may reduce conflicts but could thin liquidity in less active markets.
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has proposed rules to address conflicts of interest at prediction market exchanges that maintain affiliated principal trading desks. The agency identified at least six such exchanges with these baked-in arrangements, which allow the affiliates to bet against customers on the same platform. The CFTC determined that internal firewalls alone do not resolve the core tension between self-regulation and commercial incentives.
As reported by Sportico, the proposal stops short of an outright ban, which the agency called the most disruptive option. Instead it focuses on limiting affiliate advantages. Chairman Michael Selig‘s agency wants exchanges to assign last priority to affiliate orders at every price level, require continuous two-sided quotations in all markets where affiliates are active, and prohibit fee discounts or faster technology access.
Exchanges must maintain separate software systems, separate staff except for limited functions such as HR and accounting, and separate office space. An independent third-party firm would conduct financial surveillance of the affiliate and submit periodic compliance reports to the CFTC. Failure to certify compliance on time would force the trading arm to immediately cease qualifying as an eligible affiliate market maker. The rules also mandate plain-language disclosure of any affiliate presence alongside every betting market.
The proposal references comments received after the 2023 FTX collapse, including a Sept. 20, 2023 submission from CME Group that warned of business pressure to favor affiliates during market stress. It would alter current practices at firms such as Kalshi, whose affiliate may currently place orders on either side at competitive levels. Two-sided quoting would not apply to parlays.
Jason Robins, CEO of DraftKings, described the proposal as preliminary and said his company would submit feedback. DraftKings had previously urged a permissive approach to vertical integration. Alex Kane, CEO of Sporttrade, which does not plan to use an affiliated trading arm on its own exchange, called for stricter limits such as ownership caps, arguing that complex rules favor bad actors while burdening compliant firms. Jake Benzaquen, co-founder of ProphetX, stated that the best marketplaces avoid competing against customers in the liquidity pool.
The CFTC has set an Oct. 5 deadline for public comments. States and tribal groups are expected to weigh in, given their interest in traditional sports-betting tax revenue. The final rules could reshape liquidity provision and compliance costs for operators that rely on affiliated trading.
Reporting: Sportico
Generated by SCCG’s automated editorial system from published source reporting. Automated fact-checking and editorial checks run before publication; individual articles are not reviewed by an editor beforehand. SCCG Management holds editorial responsibility.
We work with operators building positions in prediction and event markets where affiliate market-making has been the quiet lubricant. These structural mandates—last priority, continuous quotes, separate systems—reshape unit economics and compliance overhead. If you run or invest in these platforms, Oct. 5 comment deadline matters.
SCCG angle: SCCG connects operators to regulatory counsel who shaped CFTC commodity frameworks and to market-making partners experienced in segregated affiliate structures. We help clients model liquidity impact and build third-party surveillance relationships before the comment window closes.