
TL;DR — Black Cube has escalated its 2021-initiated lawsuit against Evolution by citing the company’s UKGC settlement after a 2024 license review over unlicensed operator exposure. It also references the failed Galaxy Gaming acquisition in seeking regulatory discovery. Evolution denies any broad violation pattern or regulatory causation in the deal collapse.
SCCG Take — This filing keeps regulatory compliance risks in sharp focus for live casino suppliers, with potential to complicate licensing and M&A activity across jurisdictions.
Black Cube has filed a new submission in its legal dispute with Evolution, arguing that the live casino provider’s recent settlement with the UK Gambling Commission supports its claims of regulatory violations.
The conflict began in 2021 when an anonymous report accused Evolution of operating in prohibited markets. Evolution rejected the allegations as an effort to undermine the company and ultimately identified Black Cube as the report’s author. The Israeli investigation agency had been commissioned by competitor Playtech, which remains outside the related anti-competitive lawsuit.
Black Cube maintains that Evolution’s settlement with the UKGC, which followed a license review initiated in 2024, validates its position. The review was triggered after Evolution’s gaming products appeared on six websites of two operators that served British consumers without a UK license. Black Cube emphasized that the violations were serious enough for the UKGC to consider revoking Evolution’s license.
The filing also references Evolution’s failed agreement to acquire Galaxy Gaming, which ended before regulatory approvals. Black Cube has renewed its request for discovery into Evolution’s prior dealings with gaming regulators after an earlier request was denied.
Evolution responded that neither the UKGC settlement nor the collapsed Galaxy Gaming transaction proves Black Cube’s case. The company stated that the regulator did not find a wide pattern of its games appearing on unlicensed sites. Available information does not establish that regulatory issues caused the Galaxy Gaming deal to fail rather than a shift in strategic priorities, according to reporting by GamblingNews.
Reporting: GamblingNews
Generated by SCCG’s automated editorial system from published source reporting. Automated fact-checking and editorial checks run before publication; individual articles are not reviewed by an editor beforehand. SCCG Management holds editorial responsibility.
We've watched this fight since 2021, and it's now a textbook case of how regulatory settlements can haunt suppliers in court and at the M&A table. For live casino operators and platform providers, compliance lapses in one market now carry litigation and reputational risk across every jurisdiction where you're licensed or looking to expand.
SCCG angle: SCCG helps suppliers and operators navigate exactly this kind of regulatory crossfire. Through our network of 545 partners across every regulated market, we connect clients with the compliance architects, legal advisors, and regulatory intelligence they need to bulletproof licensing, manage third-party risk, and keep M&A clean—before a settlement becomes courtroom evidence.