
TL;DR — Luke Bateman testified that betting companies supplied drugs and alcohol to encourage heavy gambling, resulting in his AUD 1 million losses. The unproven claims coincide with a Roy Morgan survey showing millions of Australians affected by gambling harm. This adds momentum to debates on tighter VIP program rules.
SCCG Take — The inquiry underscores the binding compliance cost of visible duty-of-care failures for Australian licensees. Regulators now hold concrete examples to justify limits on personalized inducements.
Former NRL player Luke Bateman told an Australian parliamentary inquiry that betting company representatives supplied him with drugs and alcohol while encouraging heavy gambling through VIP programs. The claims, which have not been proven, describe a culture that blurred hospitality with exploitation and left him in significant debt. Testimony highlighted zero duty of care from the operators involved.
Bateman, who became an online influencer after his rugby career, said he was flown to private events and offered perks far beyond free bets. Company figures allegedly asked what substances he wanted and made them available at parties where senior betting executives took drugs alongside clients. This occurred when he was in his early twenties.
Bateman stated he was never truly in control. VIP managers sent constant messages with incentives and personalized promotions to keep him betting. His losses reached around AUD 1 million ($700,000), creating heavy debt despite a substantial salary.
There’s absolutely zero duty of care, absolute zero care for you as a human. There’s zero care for your wellbeing, for your mental state, absolutely nothing of that.
— Luke Bateman
Tim Costello, chief advocate of the Alliance for Gambling Reform, told the hearing that high-value customers often received incentives despite clear signs of problem gambling. A Roy Morgan survey found millions of adults affected by their own betting or that of family members, with financial pressure, mental health issues, and relationship breakdowns most common.
The inquiry occurs amid growing calls for tighter controls on VIP programs, inducements, advertising, and regulation. More witnesses are expected as the process continues, according to reporting by Gambling News.
Unproven allegations of this nature place existing regulatory frameworks under fresh examination. Australian operators face potential shifts in how VIP practices are monitored and restricted. The ongoing inquiry will test whether lawmakers convert such accounts into binding changes on duty-of-care standards.
Reporting: GamblingNews
SCCG has watched Australia's political climate shift fast. This testimony — drugs, alcohol, zero duty-of-care — gives lawmakers concrete narrative ammunition to justify hard limits on personalized programs. Every operator with Australian ambitions or exposure now faces a tightening compliance environment on VIP, CRM, and player protection.
SCCG angle: SCCG connects operators navigating Australian regulatory change with responsible gaming architects, compliance tech providers, and government affairs advisors across our 545-partner network. We help you build defensible VIP programs and player protection systems before the rules tighten further.