
Kalshi informed the Fourth Circuit of a July 27, 2026 Minnesota preliminary injunction blocking regulation of event contracts including sports ones as wagers. The notice applies to case No. 25-1892. It adds to legal actions testing prediction market rules.
SCCG Take — This notice supplies recent precedent on event contract classification for the pending appeal.
KalshiEX LLC submitted a FRAP 28(j) letter to the Fourth Circuit in KalshiEX LLC v. John A. Martin, et al., No. 25-1892. The letter advises the court of KalshiEX LLC v. Ellison, No. 26-cv-2778 (D. Minn. July 27, 2026). That case preliminarily enjoined a Minnesota law seeking to regulate many event contracts, including sports-event contracts, as “wagers.” The notice is documented on CourtListener.
Reporting: Kalshiex LLC v. John Martin (www.courtlistener.com)
We watch every prediction-market case because the lines between information markets and gaming keep blurring, and regulators coast-to-coast are scrambling. This FRAP 28(j) letter is procedural table-setting, but it shows Kalshi building a multi-jurisdiction playbook to keep event contracts out of gaming law—critical as our operator and platform clients navigate these same ambiguities.
SCCG angle: SCCG has guided platforms and operators through regulatory gray zones in 30+ markets. When event contracts sit between information and wager, we connect clients to the compliance, legal, and lobbying specialists who turn ambiguity into defensible product strategy—before the next injunction drops.
Gaming, betting and prediction markets — the desk’s read, every weekday.
Subscribe →