Long-Term Licensing Deals and Emerging Tech: The Importance of Proof of Concept

The lawsuit between the NFL Players Association (NFLPA) and DraftKings over unpaid licensing fees for an NFT marketplace underscores a crucial point that everyone in the gaming, sports, and entertainment industries should be aware of: jumping into emerging technologies without fully understanding the risks can be costly. DraftKings, a prominent player in sports betting, is now facing a lawsuit that alleges they owe the NFLPA around $65 million for unpaid licensing fees related to their NFT (non-fungible token) marketplace, which has since been shuttered. This situation raises an important issue for anyone considering entering the rapidly evolving world of NFTs and digital assets.

NFTs have been heralded as revolutionary in the digital economy, particularly for industries like gaming, sports, and entertainment, where the value of intellectual property (IP) is immense. Brands and organizations have seen NFT marketplaces as new avenues for monetizing fan engagement and capitalizing on digital collectibles. The idea of licensing athletes’ likenesses, names, and other IP for NFTs can sound like a goldmine, offering potentially lucrative revenue streams.

But this optimism often overshadows the complexity and risks involved. As with any new technology, there are pitfalls—both legal and financial—that can arise if diligence is not done before entering large-scale licensing deals.

The dispute between the NFLPA and DraftKings highlights the importance of fully grasping the technology and the market landscape before committing to high-stakes agreements. In this case, DraftKings’ shuttered NFT marketplace represents a failed venture, yet the financial obligations linked to their licensing deal with the NFLPA persist. The company is now being sued for breach of contract, and the repercussions extend far beyond missed payments—they now face potential damage to their reputation, strained relationships with key partners, and possible legal penalties.

This is a prime example of why companies must deeply understand the technology they’re investing in. The NFT market, like any rapidly evolving sector, is subject to volatility. It requires careful research, realistic expectations, and a firm understanding of how that technology fits into broader business strategies. Without this, businesses can be exposed to significant financial risks, as seen in the current lawsuit.

When it comes to emerging technologies like NFTs, due diligence cannot be overstated. Companies and organizations must not only understand the tech behind NFTs but also the market dynamics, potential regulatory concerns, and long-term viability. In the case of DraftKings, perhaps more attention should have been paid to whether the NFT market would be sustainable and how long-term obligations like licensing payments would be impacted by market fluctuations or product closures.

There are lessons here for anyone entering similar ventures, particularly those involving new and evolving tech. If the market changes, businesses can’t always easily back out of agreements, especially when contracts involve guaranteed minimum payments, as we see in this lawsuit. Without careful contract negotiations and foresight, companies may find themselves paying for deals long after the opportunity has ceased to be profitable.

This case highlights the importance of anticipating potential failure and having contingency plans in place. The tech world is littered with the remains of “next big things” that failed to meet expectations. The rapid rise and fall of various NFT platforms prove that this technology is no different. Companies must prepare for the possibility that their bet on new technology might not pay off. For those entering into licensing deals, it’s critical to clearly define exit strategies, ensure contracts allow for flexibility in changing market conditions, and avoid overcommitting to unproven technologies.

The lawsuit between the NFLPA and DraftKings serves as a cautionary tale for everyone considering investing in or licensing emerging technologies. NFTs may still have tremendous potential, but the market is volatile, and companies must tread carefully. The allure of quick gains can be tempting, but understanding the technology, market dynamics, and the potential risks must take precedence over enthusiasm.

In the end, companies that succeed in this space will be the ones that not only understand the rewards but also the inherent risks—and plan for both accordingly.

Subscribe

Privacy(Required)