Michigan Ramps Up Enforcement Against Offshore Gambling
Michigan is taking serious steps to protect its regulated gaming market—and its residents. The Michigan Gaming Control Board (MGCB) has now issued cease-and-desist orders to 52 illegal iGaming operators in 2025 alone, following its latest sweep against 13 offshore sites last week. These sites, based in jurisdictions like Curaçao, Costa Rica, and Anjouan, have been found targeting Michigan players without licenses and outside the bounds of consumer protection laws.
This aggressive stance isn’t just about enforcement—it’s about making Michigan one of the most secure, player-focused online gaming markets in the U.S.
Why This Matters to Players
Offshore gambling platforms can seem tempting with flashy bonuses and easy access. But what most players don’t realize is that these sites often impose unfair wagering requirements, restrict withdrawals, or withhold winnings altogether. On top of that, they operate without any oversight regarding data security, responsible gaming standards, or age verification.
Michigan’s regulated operators, in contrast, are held to high standards when it comes to player protection, transparency, and fair play. The MGCB’s crackdown sends a clear message: the state will not tolerate platforms that exploit players or undermine its licensed operators.
Offshore Doesn’t Mean Out of Reach
The recent round of enforcement includes big-name offshore casinos like Captain Jack Casino, Ducky Luck, El Royale, and Red Dog Casino. These platforms use cryptocurrencies, PayPal, and credit card options to lure players—often with little concern for responsible gaming frameworks or state laws.
Each operator has been given 14 days to cease operations or face legal action in coordination with the Michigan Attorney General’s Office. It’s a bold move that’s putting other states on notice.
Protecting the Market—and the Industry
Michigan’s legal gaming industry is thriving. From online casinos to sports betting, it’s a revenue-driving sector that also supports thousands of jobs and critical tax income. By cutting off rogue operators, the state not only protects players—it reinforces the credibility of its market.
This effort also reflects broader national trends. As more states launch iGaming frameworks, maintaining consumer trust and market integrity becomes non-negotiable. Michigan is ahead of the curve, using enforcement not just as punishment—but as strategy.
What Players Should Do
Michigan residents are encouraged to play only on state-approved platforms listed on Michigan.gov/MGCB. Any suspicious platforms or experiences should be reported to the MGCB tip line. The more the public participates in policing the market, the stronger the ecosystem becomes.
Conclusion:
Michigan’s proactive approach sets a new bar for online gambling enforcement. As the iGaming market grows, states that want to succeed will need more than regulation—they’ll need real action. Michigan’s crackdown proves that a secure, legal gaming environment is not just possible—it’s the expectation.
